New to me '77 Sport

A place for members to post a little about themselves and a picture of your rig.

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby Viperwolf1 » Wed Jul 11, 2012 1:03 pm

The explorer serp system was the same from 1996-2001. The balancer is even correct for an '81 and newer 302. EFI parts are better closer to '96. Explorer ECU, harness and MAF are not usable.

Truck serp systems are typically too long to fit well.
Viperwolf1
 

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby Aztec77Bronco » Fri Jul 13, 2012 6:22 am

Well I finally got the dash, column & front wiring harness removed last night. I'm hopefully gonna get the heater, pedals & such out today. It's coming along slow, but I was meticulous on the harness so I knew where everything went back.
'77 Sport, 302 HO on it's way to a resurrection!
'03 Mercedes CLK 320 Cabriolet (W208 body)
'13 Ford F350 Lariat Crew Cab 4wd Power Stroke
User avatar
Aztec77Bronco
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 119
Images: 0
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:54 am
Location: Just south of Durango

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby Aztec77Bronco » Thu Jul 19, 2012 11:13 am

Well been tied up with livestock, work & kids but wanted to ask a quick question. my grandma came to town today and I got to have breakfast with her & her husband. They LIVE for the casino in Ignacio! LOL Anywho she got a minivan and retired her 2001 explorer, it's an Eddie Bauer AWD with the V8. I researched & it looks like it has the 5.0L. Ball joints are shot w/ 233k miles, BUT said she'd let me have it real cheap, which basically means come visit & haul it home. SO is the '01 Exploder a good year to rob EFI & all the other goodies from? I doubt the AWD system is worth much, but it should have the serp, heavier alternator & such I need to cross over on my 302 HO if I'm correct. How much of this thing is usable, if any? I know most guys are saying the '96 is best, so some input would be greatly appreciated before I commit.
'77 Sport, 302 HO on it's way to a resurrection!
'03 Mercedes CLK 320 Cabriolet (W208 body)
'13 Ford F350 Lariat Crew Cab 4wd Power Stroke
User avatar
Aztec77Bronco
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 119
Images: 0
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:54 am
Location: Just south of Durango

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby Rox Crusher » Thu Jul 19, 2012 11:25 am

Aztec77Bronco wrote:Well been tied up with livestock, work & kids but wanted to ask a quick question. my grandma came to town today and I got to have breakfast with her & her husband. They LIVE for the casino in Ignacio! LOL Anywho she got a minivan and retired her 2001 explorer, it's an Eddie Bauer AWD with the V8. I researched & it looks like it has the 5.0L. Ball joints are shot w/ 233k miles, BUT said she'd let me have it real cheap, which basically means come visit & haul it home. SO is the '01 Exploder a good year to rob EFI & all the other goodies from? I doubt the AWD system is worth much, but it should have the serp, heavier alternator & such I need to cross over on my 302 HO if I'm correct. How much of this thing is usable, if any? I know most guys are saying the '96 is best, so some input would be greatly appreciated before I commit.


The 01 should be a good donor for EFI parts and serp set up.

I would change the fuel injectors over to the Orange 19 lbs vs the White 14 lbs ones that I believe are on it.

The throttle body from a 96 is more desirable because the sensore sits lower which helps with hood clearance. These are readily available from pull-n-pay or ebay if you aren't in a hurry.

The 4R70W transmission from 98 - 01 Explorer is very desirable for anyone wanting to do that swap.
1977 Sport, 351w OBDII EFI motor, 4R70W auto, 4:88 gears, ARB lockers, 3.5" suspension, 33" tires.
User avatar
Rox Crusher
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 3980
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 4:36 pm
Location: Roxborough Park, Colorado

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby Aztec77Bronco » Thu Jul 19, 2012 3:28 pm

Thanks Rox,
Since I'm missing my tranny will the 4R70W work better than the AOD I was planning on? If so, how much of a bear is it to get the linkage from the old C4 to work & how much modification will I need for the transfer to hook up. I have the T-20 J shift. I was planning on an AOD anyway, so I already know I'll have to go with the advance adapter kit but can't find anay adapters for the 4R70W. It shows a lower ratio for 1st & 2nd which might let me get away with 4.11's instead of 4.56's.

BTW- in regards to the sensor I was planning a 2" body lift & thinking 3.5" suspension. I want to run 35's. I've heard that with an AOD you need 4.56's to get it to not shift in & out of OD. I have no personal experience so definitely open to input.

**EDIT**
I found the AOD TO AODE SHAFT KIT Product# 716057 that goes with #50-2704 Ford AOD (1988-91) 4 speed automatic overdrive transmission to the 1966-77 Bronco Dana 20 with a provision to retain the original early Bronco mount on Advance adapters site. Of course the adapter is $575, it's on special, then the little kit is $26, also on special. Here's the links hopefully I'm on the right track.

http://www.advanceadapters.com/products/pn-50-2704/
http://www.advanceadapters.com/products/pn-716057/

shrug
Last edited by Aztec77Bronco on Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
'77 Sport, 302 HO on it's way to a resurrection!
'03 Mercedes CLK 320 Cabriolet (W208 body)
'13 Ford F350 Lariat Crew Cab 4wd Power Stroke
User avatar
Aztec77Bronco
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 119
Images: 0
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:54 am
Location: Just south of Durango

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby Rox Crusher » Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:00 pm

If you are going to put a 2" body lift on then the difference between the 96 throttle body height and later is of no concern.

The 4R70W would be a better choice than the AOD in my opinion and it uses the AOD adapter (it just isn't advertised as such).

There is a Lokar shift linkage for AOD / 4R70W that I used on mine successfully and it was pretty straight forward and works well.

http://www.lokar.com/product-pgs/column ... tlink.html

The down side to the 4R70W versus the AOD is you will need a computer which is money ($600+/-) but it allows you to adjust shift points and turn the OD off if you want to.

In my opinion, 4.10 aren't a good choice even with 35" tires but you could check that with one of the gear ratio calculators.

I currently have 33" tires and 3.50 gears which is a horrible combination for the OD. I will stay with 33" treads but am waffling between 4.88 and 5.13 to get desired RPM (2200 - 2400 RPM?) in OD at hiway speeds.
1977 Sport, 351w OBDII EFI motor, 4R70W auto, 4:88 gears, ARB lockers, 3.5" suspension, 33" tires.
User avatar
Rox Crusher
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 3980
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 4:36 pm
Location: Roxborough Park, Colorado

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby Aztec77Bronco » Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:18 pm

Do they make a controller that does both the EFI & 4R70W? Would be nice if there was. To be honest I'm not even sure where to find the controller for the EFI at this point. I located one for tranny, after my initial shock I started breathing again, of course it was at summit. You weren't kidding on the 600+, emphasis on the +.
'77 Sport, 302 HO on it's way to a resurrection!
'03 Mercedes CLK 320 Cabriolet (W208 body)
'13 Ford F350 Lariat Crew Cab 4wd Power Stroke
User avatar
Aztec77Bronco
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 119
Images: 0
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:54 am
Location: Just south of Durango

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby Rox Crusher » Thu Jul 19, 2012 5:58 pm

here is the cat's meow for tranny controller

http://www.becontrols.com/

EFI computer (A9L or equivelant) can be found at pull-n-pay or ordered from Orielly's Auto

I think the application is 87 - 93 mustang with 5.0 HO ?
1977 Sport, 351w OBDII EFI motor, 4R70W auto, 4:88 gears, ARB lockers, 3.5" suspension, 33" tires.
User avatar
Rox Crusher
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 3980
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 4:36 pm
Location: Roxborough Park, Colorado

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby Aztec77Bronco » Mon Jul 30, 2012 10:02 am

Update an status, Bronco Porn to come soon!

The boys helped me get the top & hood out of the shop and stacked behind on pallets. Who would have thought 2 teenagers would whine about how heavy the top was! ROFL! I showed them the "Old Man" could still hold his own by carrying the back by myself. YES my back was sore, NO I never let them see it!

I pulled the roll bar and am prepping to wire wheel the rust. Got the tire carrier loose & tailgate goes next. SO.... I've priced my sheet metal, it's gonna be @ $1700.00 except the rear fenders and the firewall I think most will be new on the floor, plus rockers, door posts & inner fenders. I am more than willing to haul to a GOOD media blaster, but is it worth it? From what I've heard most the guys around here are a bit heavy handed & tend to warp panels. I want to get the whole thing blasted so I can seal the whole bottom. I am a bit worried that if I pop everything loose it'll buckle in the middle if I don't redo the known issues first. So which is it? The chicken or the egg? I want to do this right the first time! I've priced at BG & TBP, they're within $100, but I've heard, no actual knowledge, the BG does the old "stomp & stuff" trick to pack them & I really don't want to get flat floor pans when I need them pre-bent right.

Does anyone have any experience with either, or is there somewhere else I should look?

Sheet metal so far is:
5 piece floor pan kit, Both rockers Inside & Out, Both door posts & both kick panels, Both inner fender skirts, rear floor board repair pan, all 4 rear extension panels, tailgate & upper cowl extension panel.

The next question is on repairing. Front to back or back to front. I know from fabrication the key is measure twice cut once, I really want to do a great job on this old girl!
'77 Sport, 302 HO on it's way to a resurrection!
'03 Mercedes CLK 320 Cabriolet (W208 body)
'13 Ford F350 Lariat Crew Cab 4wd Power Stroke
User avatar
Aztec77Bronco
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 119
Images: 0
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:54 am
Location: Just south of Durango

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby JGZ » Mon Jul 30, 2012 12:57 pm

Call Mellisa at Bronco hut.303-663-1455.Save on shipping.They all sell pretty much the same sheet metal.
JGZ
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 393
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 2:20 pm
Location: Pueblo West

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby hockeydad4-22 » Mon Jul 30, 2012 2:10 pm

I am more than willing to haul to a GOOD media blaster, but is it worth it?

If you are willing to bring it to the Denver area - Blast-tec in Englewood is excelent. And you could go to the Bronco Hut and pick up your sheet metal, they are in Castle Rock just south of Denver.
[color=#BFFF40]Greg

If you are the smartest person in the room -
You are in the wrong room
User avatar
hockeydad4-22
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 2378
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:11 pm
Location: Highlands Ranch Colorado

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby Rox Crusher » Mon Jul 30, 2012 3:19 pm

My vote would be to consider wild horses for the sheet metal

That is where I got mine and it was cheaper than bronco hut even after factoring in the freight

Plus I understand from others that the quality of their sheet metal is much better than the other shiot
1977 Sport, 351w OBDII EFI motor, 4R70W auto, 4:88 gears, ARB lockers, 3.5" suspension, 33" tires.
User avatar
Rox Crusher
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 3980
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 4:36 pm
Location: Roxborough Park, Colorado

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby hockeydad4-22 » Tue Jul 31, 2012 6:13 am

I have no idea about the quality from either as I have never purchased any. We have just welded in flat panels from sheets I purchase locally for all the sheet metal we have replaced. Structural members such as door jambs we actually welded in heavy duty 1/4" thick angle to replace the rotted factory stuff. But remember - we are not attempting to build any kind of factory restoration. No restoration at all. Trying to build a bronco M1 tank so maybe Drew will stop breaking it...
[color=#BFFF40]Greg

If you are the smartest person in the room -
You are in the wrong room
User avatar
hockeydad4-22
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 2378
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:11 pm
Location: Highlands Ranch Colorado

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby Aztec77Bronco » Tue Jul 31, 2012 7:44 am

Ok, I stopped and talked shop with an auto body guy here local & he showed me some video's of what he's looking at purchasing. It's a crushed glass & water media blaster that has a rust inhibitor. Have any of yall heard of that??? My brain is a bit confused as I think of water and metal as major No! No's! here's the links:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQ7CFGIP4uk

http://dustlessblasting.com/automotive/

If you go through the specs they do show removal & such of rust, corrosion & scale on marine vessels as well. Still wondering though???

Do I blast first or after I've done major floor repairs? shrug
'77 Sport, 302 HO on it's way to a resurrection!
'03 Mercedes CLK 320 Cabriolet (W208 body)
'13 Ford F350 Lariat Crew Cab 4wd Power Stroke
User avatar
Aztec77Bronco
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 119
Images: 0
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:54 am
Location: Just south of Durango

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby Booger » Wed Aug 01, 2012 2:48 am

I think I'd blast after, that way you get the protection of no rust from the inhibitor on all panels. I have heard of the soda blasting (I think that's it) that will inhibit rust. It does go against your regular thinking though (water + steel = rust)
Bob - Turning hydrocarbons into noise since 1970

Spiritual owner of the now Zoso mobile (1974 Bronco Ranger - EFI 351W-4R70W-ARB front and rear-STC softtop- High Country hood-3 1/2" WH lift- Cross inboard rear shock mnt- Duffs bumpers- Warn 8274- 33's- Cheby disc conversion)
User avatar
Booger
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 809
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 5:55 pm
Location: Broomfield

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby Aztec77Bronco » Wed Aug 01, 2012 7:14 am

Quick Motor Question

I looked at my block casting number above the starter last night to verify what motor the '77 has. When I bought it the guy told me it was a 302HO from an '86 mustang. here's what I found:

E7TE - 1987, Truck Division, Engine division I think is what this means
7E11 - stamped where it looks like 2 screws are 05/11/87 I think
1,3,7,2,6,5,4,8 - firing order Does this denote HO?

I am NOT a motor guru, I've installed plenty of long blocks, but never bothered to go any deeper, I installed heads once when I was 16 or 17. So where do I find all the info for this block & where can I find a casting # to identify the heads. It has Moroso valve covers, edelbrock intake & carb, don't know which one so if yall could tell me where to look on that too I'd sure appreciate it.

I talked to Melissa at Bronco Hut yesterday & she's getting my sheet metal order put together. So now I'm looking at the motor, tranny & transfer stuff. I do have a line on an '89 AOD for $200 w/ 34k from a mustang GT, he said $75 if it's no good. I'd rather just rebuild it regardless tho. So as much "Viper Built" stuff as I'm seeing, is he "Da Man" for the job? Does he do J'cases too?

Next Q.... On the Ford 9", did the '77 have a 31 or 28 spline? There is a tag on the housing that's all rusted so I'm going to try and get it cleaned, BUT was looking at doing a 35 spline upgrade & disc brake conversion w/E-brake. I'll be rolling 35's so thinking somewhere in the neighborhood of 4.56 ratio for @ 1760 rpm @ 60 mph. Will that create shift flutter in OD? Having a heckuva time finding ring & pinion sets that pair up for the 9" & D44. They're close but not quite. Would rather have 5.25 ratio.

Here's a pic of engine casting
Image
'77 Sport, 302 HO on it's way to a resurrection!
'03 Mercedes CLK 320 Cabriolet (W208 body)
'13 Ford F350 Lariat Crew Cab 4wd Power Stroke
User avatar
Aztec77Bronco
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 119
Images: 0
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:54 am
Location: Just south of Durango

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby hockeydad4-22 » Wed Aug 01, 2012 7:47 am

Lets see - the answer to all your questions is the same:

Viperwolf is "Da Man". As far as your trans is concerned - he is not only "Da Man", but he is "Da Only Man" most of us would trust with our transmissions.

I am sure he will chime in here soon with the answers to the rest of your questions.
[color=#BFFF40]Greg

If you are the smartest person in the room -
You are in the wrong room
User avatar
hockeydad4-22
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 2378
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:11 pm
Location: Highlands Ranch Colorado

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby Rox Crusher » Wed Aug 01, 2012 8:32 am

Yes, viper is "da man" when it comes to anything classic bronco, especially transmissions.

He has done several for me including my 4R70W (electronic version of AOD).
1977 Sport, 351w OBDII EFI motor, 4R70W auto, 4:88 gears, ARB lockers, 3.5" suspension, 33" tires.
User avatar
Rox Crusher
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 3980
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 4:36 pm
Location: Roxborough Park, Colorado

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby Aztec77Bronco » Wed Aug 19, 2015 3:07 pm

Well after what seems like forever getting the Bronco into forward motion I'm finally back on it. icon biggin Does anyone have measurement specs for making sure the doors line up correctly. I have to replace floor pans, inner and outer rockers & door pillars on both sides. I am looking for a good top to install & help keep everything true'd up as well as planning on replacing the body mounts with metal shims to eliminate flex or sag. Any help would be appreciated.
:Welding:
'77 Sport, 302 HO on it's way to a resurrection!
'03 Mercedes CLK 320 Cabriolet (W208 body)
'13 Ford F350 Lariat Crew Cab 4wd Power Stroke
User avatar
Aztec77Bronco
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 119
Images: 0
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:54 am
Location: Just south of Durango

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby phyler » Wed Aug 19, 2015 3:35 pm

Aztec77Bronco wrote:Well after what seems like forever getting the Bronco into forward motion I'm finally back on it. icon biggin Does anyone have measurement specs for making sure the doors line up correctly. I have to replace floor pans, inner and outer rockers & door pillars on both sides. I am looking for a good top to install & help keep everything true'd up as well as planning on replacing the body mounts with metal shims to eliminate flex or sag. Any help would be appreciated.
:Welding:


Here's a thread I started the other day about this exact topic: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=7719

We can swap stories and advice!

Adam
1975 Ranger Edition that I've had longer than I've been without it.
phyler
CCB Admin
 
Posts: 1202
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:41 pm
Location: Erie

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby Gunnibronco » Wed Aug 19, 2015 4:45 pm

I wouldn't change the body mounts to metal, the rubber or poly gives a little cushion you need between the frame and the body. I think the ride would get harsh & possibly noisy. The new poly mounts won't crush the way the old rubber ones did. Check your body braces, especially under the driver & passenger's feet, to make sure they are straight. They can bend and screw up the door alignment.
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." – Claire Wolfe
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, TGW HP1060 and HP1014 axles, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, York OBA, 4x4x2, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
User avatar
Gunnibronco
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 4074
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:07 pm
Location: Gardnerville, NV

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby Aztec77Bronco » Thu Aug 20, 2015 10:31 am

Phyler Thanks! Nice specs! I see provided by none other than Gunni!

Gunni it's not a permanent swap, just strictly to keep the body squared with the frame. My theory is that if the mounts don't have the ability to flex, with proper bracing on the body as well as rigid attachment to the frame, I will have a higher probability that I can keep all measurements true and the doors will line up correctly. I planned on using jack stands under the frame as well so that the suspension won't give through this process as well. What are your thoughts?

BTW can you email me those specs for the bronco? I'll PM you my email. I assume I use the specs for the "77 Explorer since mine is a "77 Sport?
'77 Sport, 302 HO on it's way to a resurrection!
'03 Mercedes CLK 320 Cabriolet (W208 body)
'13 Ford F350 Lariat Crew Cab 4wd Power Stroke
User avatar
Aztec77Bronco
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 119
Images: 0
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:54 am
Location: Just south of Durango

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby Gunnibronco » Thu Aug 20, 2015 11:19 am

Aztec77Bronco wrote:Gunni it's not a permanent swap, just strictly to keep the body squared with the frame. My theory is that if the mounts don't have the ability to flex, with proper bracing on the body as well as rigid attachment to the frame, I will have a higher probability that I can keep all measurements true and the doors will line up correctly. I planned on using jack stands under the frame as well so that the suspension won't give through this process as well. What are your thoughts?

BTW can you email me those specs for the bronco? I'll PM you my email. I assume I use the specs for the "77 Explorer since mine is a "77 Sport?



I just installed new poly bodymounts and think they are fine for what you need to do. The metal mounts & jack stands would be overkill. I'd just make sure the truck is sitting fairly level, no major "Bronco Lean", and then measure, brace, etc.

The spec sheet with the all the different measurements were circulating around CB.com and I just kept a copy & keep distributing it. I can send you a copy or you can download the copy I posted, I think. I'm sure all the '77 bodies are the same, and you can use those measurements.

The pic with measurements A & B were posted by someone on Facebook, and I had just taken the measurements off my truck & my friend's stock '66 so I know they are ok. I just pushed/pulled my cowl & door post around to make things fit better on my truck (and its still all apart) so if you need any other measurements I can help.

The bedrails should measure 56" between them.

I have some other frame, & body measurement sheets saved, but I didn't find them very helpful. If you want them I can send them to you, or post them up here.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." – Claire Wolfe
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, TGW HP1060 and HP1014 axles, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, York OBA, 4x4x2, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
User avatar
Gunnibronco
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 4074
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:07 pm
Location: Gardnerville, NV

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby sykanr0ng » Thu Aug 20, 2015 11:24 am

To answer your question that was buried in a previous post:

Every stock Bronco 9" rear was 28 spline.


Also if you are going to an Automatic OverDrive transmission and 35" tires you would probably be better with 5.13 gears.

302 / 5.0L engines like more RPM's to produce power.
"You say overkill like it's a bad thing."
User avatar
sykanr0ng
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 405
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:46 am
Location: Greeley, CO

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby Aztec77Bronco » Thu Aug 20, 2015 12:02 pm

Gunnibronco wrote:
I just installed new poly bodymounts and think they are fine for what you need to do. The metal mounts & jack stands would be overkill. I'd just make sure the truck is sitting fairly level, no major "Bronco Lean", and then measure, brace, etc.


Overkill??? Me??? Why I NEVER!! ROFL icon biggin Overkill is my middle name! Ask my better half! Probably doesn't help that I was head welder/fabricator for a hydraulic & mine equipment repair company. :laughing2:

I'm also slightly OCD so that doesn't help either. A little worried about welding sheet metal as compared to heavy steel and thick gauged pipe though.

Any thoughts on a good mig to use? I've looked at a couple of the 120V models, but not sure they are gonna do the trick. Also what is a good wire/gas combo? I imagine flux core would be way overkill. Seen some wires that are straight CO2, some 75%/25%, and some for Argon. Like to stick with Lincon, Hobart or Miller. I want something I can always get parts for. shrug
'77 Sport, 302 HO on it's way to a resurrection!
'03 Mercedes CLK 320 Cabriolet (W208 body)
'13 Ford F350 Lariat Crew Cab 4wd Power Stroke
User avatar
Aztec77Bronco
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 119
Images: 0
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:54 am
Location: Just south of Durango

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby Eck » Thu Aug 20, 2015 12:08 pm

This recently came up:

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=2337&hilit=welder&start=330

Starts most of the way down on the page... might be a good start to see some opinions.
69 Wagon, 351W, Explorer EFI & Serpentine, ZF5, 35" tires, 3.5 SL, 2 BL, WARN 8274
User avatar
Eck
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 2460
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby Aztec77Bronco » Thu Aug 20, 2015 12:17 pm

sykanr0ng wrote:To answer your question that was buried in a previous post:

Every stock Bronco 9" rear was 28 spline.


Also if you are going to an Automatic OverDrive transmission and 35" tires you would probably be better with 5.13 gears.

302 / 5.0L engines like more RPM's to produce power.



My plans now are a 351W (still debating in EFI or Carb), 4R70W tranny & convert the J shift to a 2 stick.
'77 Sport, 302 HO on it's way to a resurrection!
'03 Mercedes CLK 320 Cabriolet (W208 body)
'13 Ford F350 Lariat Crew Cab 4wd Power Stroke
User avatar
Aztec77Bronco
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 119
Images: 0
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:54 am
Location: Just south of Durango

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby Aztec77Bronco » Thu Aug 20, 2015 12:46 pm

Eck wrote:This recently came up:

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=2337&hilit=welder&start=330

Starts most of the way down on the page... might be a good start to see some opinions.



Thanks Eck! Kinda along the same lines I was thinking. Then I had to read the rest of the posts! WOW!

And I thought I've had bad days!!!
'77 Sport, 302 HO on it's way to a resurrection!
'03 Mercedes CLK 320 Cabriolet (W208 body)
'13 Ford F350 Lariat Crew Cab 4wd Power Stroke
User avatar
Aztec77Bronco
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 119
Images: 0
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:54 am
Location: Just south of Durango

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby Gunnibronco » Thu Aug 20, 2015 3:45 pm

Stick with a 220v machine (110v will work on sheetmetal- but will not be a long term plan for Mr. Overkill), and 75/25 mix gas.

I'm the opposite, I do sheet metal for work, but don't have the touch with the thicker stuff yet. We just got a Miller Synchrowave TIG at work, so now I gotta learn. Got a quick lesson & played with it a little last week. Very cool.
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." – Claire Wolfe
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, TGW HP1060 and HP1014 axles, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, York OBA, 4x4x2, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
User avatar
Gunnibronco
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 4074
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:07 pm
Location: Gardnerville, NV

Re: New to me '77 Sport

Postby sykanr0ng » Thu Aug 20, 2015 9:12 pm

Aztec77Bronco wrote:
sykanr0ng wrote:To answer your question that was buried in a previous post:

Every stock Bronco 9" rear was 28 spline.


Also if you are going to an Automatic OverDrive transmission and 35" tires you would probably be better with 5.13 gears.

302 / 5.0L engines like more RPM's to produce power.



My plans now are a 351W (still debating in EFI or Carb), 4R70W tranny & convert the J shift to a 2 stick.


I think even a 351W would be happier at something like 2200+ RPM rather than 1760.

Unless you want it downshifting every time there is a headwind gust, or the grade increases a degree.
"You say overkill like it's a bad thing."
User avatar
sykanr0ng
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 405
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:46 am
Location: Greeley, CO

PreviousNext

Return to Members Rigs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests