|
It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 10:50 pm
|
Author |
Message |
Strike2
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 11:34 am Posts: 808
|
351 EFI OEM vs NEW
So I have reviewed all the EFI threads on CCB, along with internet info, the "inject your horse" is the best I've found so far but still kind of confusing it seems there is no one donor veichle for the parts needed To convert a carb 351. Correct me if I'm wrong. I would like to get JY parts for the EFI conversion or there are even some low cost crown Vic's or explorers on CL are the OEM parts worth getting or by the time you get all the parts needed is a FITech/ Holley EFI carb worth looking into? Does anyone here run that setup. I would like to start gathering parts now but Im somewhat dazed and confused at the moment .
|
Wed Dec 21, 2016 7:48 pm |
|
|
pgilbeau
Official CCB Member
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:06 pm Posts: 639 Location: Falcon, CO
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
I was going to go with the factory fuel injection set ups but opted to get the Fitech. Once I get my motor back together it will be running the Fitech instead of the Holley Injection it had when I got it. I personally started to feel like it was going to cost me just as much if not more for the factory EFI. It all depends how you do it and what you run. If you start looking for things like lightening lower intakes and stuff the costs add up quick. Just my 2 cents but for me the Fitech fits what I have and is good up to 600hp so its much easier in my case.
_________________ 1969 Bronco: Full widths, 3 linked front end, 37's, hydro-boost, 4x4x2 box, ZF5, Atlas t-case, and fuel injected 302
|
Wed Dec 21, 2016 8:05 pm |
|
|
Strike2
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 11:34 am Posts: 808
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
Thanks pgilbeau, I'm not looking at increasing HP on the 351 I would just like the simplicity of EFI, and coming from a XJ 4.0 I'm hoping it will do much better going up I-70. I'll be interested in your opion on the fitech as it looks to be worth the money. Are you running a 351 as well?
|
Wed Dec 21, 2016 8:28 pm |
|
|
Rox Crusher
Official CCB Member
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 5:36 pm Posts: 3980 Location: Roxborough Park, Colorado
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
I'm a fan of the OEM parts route as replacement parts are readily available and the breadth of knowledge is much better. There is a thread about FiTech system on CB.com http://classicbroncos.com/forums/showth ... 25&page=21
_________________ 1977 Sport, 351w OBDII EFI motor, 4R70W auto, 4:88 gears, ARB lockers, 3.5" suspension, 33" tires.
|
Wed Dec 21, 2016 8:49 pm |
|
|
Eck
Official CCB Member
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:33 pm Posts: 2460
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
What are your plans with the 351? I just got done upgrading mine with GT40 heads and a roller cam because I was unhappy with the ability to drive I-70 with the stockish setup. I have OEM EFI and will admit that it's not cheap but do agree with Rox that parts are readily available and a lot of people locally are running that setup.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
_________________ 69 Wagon, 351W, Explorer EFI & Serpentine, ZF5, 35" tires, 3.5 SL, 2 BL, WARN 8274
|
Wed Dec 21, 2016 9:08 pm |
|
|
pgilbeau
Official CCB Member
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:06 pm Posts: 639 Location: Falcon, CO
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
I am currently running a 302 and will be going to a 351 later in the year, my plans are a bit different as I may even go with a stroked motor. I will agree that finding stock replacement parts is easier.
_________________ 1969 Bronco: Full widths, 3 linked front end, 37's, hydro-boost, 4x4x2 box, ZF5, Atlas t-case, and fuel injected 302
|
Wed Dec 21, 2016 10:00 pm |
|
|
Strike2
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 11:34 am Posts: 808
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
[quote="Eck"]What are your plans with the 351? I just got done upgrading mine with GT40 heads and a roller cam because I was unhappy with the ability to drive I-70 with the stockish setup. I have OEM EFI and will admit that it's not cheap but do agree with Rox that parts are readily available and a lot of people locally are running that setup.
My plans for the 351 was to just clean it up with EFI I'm really not interested in "go fast" parts at this time unless I need it and have ready that heads are the best bang for the money in HP gain. What was your average speed (302 or 351) going up I-70. My friends dad purchased it back in the 80's and never got a chance to install it. The tag says it's rebuilt but I've yet to confirm that for the meantime I hope to just run the stock 302 since it only has 13K on the motor.
I hoping over the next several months to attend some Meet & Greets and get some advise on a parts list and weigh out the pros/cons of OEM or FITech along with checking out some Broncos in person. I pretty lucky as I work somewhat close to the UPAP and have been known to spend my lunch hours there scouting out parts.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
|
Thu Dec 22, 2016 7:51 am |
|
|
Rox Crusher
Official CCB Member
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 5:36 pm Posts: 3980 Location: Roxborough Park, Colorado
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
_________________ 1977 Sport, 351w OBDII EFI motor, 4R70W auto, 4:88 gears, ARB lockers, 3.5" suspension, 33" tires.
|
Thu Dec 22, 2016 8:01 am |
|
|
airbur
Official CCB Member
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 8:39 am Posts: 1721 Images: 0 Location: Castle Pines, CO
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
_________________ Sold: 1970 w/427W Injected Stroker
|
Thu Dec 22, 2016 9:06 am |
|
|
Eck
Official CCB Member
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:33 pm Posts: 2460
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
_________________ 69 Wagon, 351W, Explorer EFI & Serpentine, ZF5, 35" tires, 3.5 SL, 2 BL, WARN 8274
|
Thu Dec 22, 2016 1:10 pm |
|
|
Strike2
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 11:34 am Posts: 808
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
Thanks Eck, Two of the down sides on getting the Bronco was no EFI and the 302/351 HP compared to a 4.0 HO. I may have to just stay in the slow lane since I will be switching to AT, 4.88 on 35's just like my last build, your right lots to consider and I hope to get a better understanding once I'm able to see other CCB rigs. So what year of Explorer uppers are you running, and what lower did you go with on the 351?
|
Thu Dec 22, 2016 3:03 pm |
|
|
Viperwolf1
Official CCB Member
Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 10:37 pm Posts: 1485
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
The drawback to a 351w is the cost of an efi intake manifold. You can run the cheap explorer upper but you need the expensive lightning lower. Aftermarket intake is another choice. The truck (non-lightning) intakes are just too tall. All the other parts costs are very similar between 351w and 302. A 351w is basically a factory stroked 302.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
|
Thu Dec 22, 2016 6:59 pm |
|
|
Strike2
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 11:34 am Posts: 808
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
Sounds like I need to make a choice between two evils lol, just a wild thought but the money spent on a EFI maybe better spent on a set of 351 heads and keep the carb and have it well tuned? Thanks for everyone feedback it's got me needed to make a new spreadsheet.
|
Thu Dec 22, 2016 9:42 pm |
|
|
Gunnibronco
Official CCB Member
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 6:07 pm Posts: 4074 Location: Gardnerville, NV
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
Combine our altitude and off camber crawling, IMO a carb is out of the question. Too much vapor lock due to altitude, and flooding/stalling when a carb runs at high angles.
My two cents regarding aftermarket vs factory stuff. When I got my truck 20+ years ago, I was a youngster. First thing I did was rip all the FoMoCo stuff off, and replace it with shiny stuff from Summit racing. I later found out the old 2bbl Ford carb was considered a better off-road carb than my Edelbrock (not to mention the POS Holly Pro-jection I tried before giving up and putting on an Edelbrock). I found out the Ford locking hubs were better than the Mile Marker hubs I bought. I found out the Dura-spark ignition was a pretty solid ignition system. Through the years, what failed? Edelbrock mechanical fuel pumps, MSD ignition parts, Mile Marker hubs. I think this is directly related to the size of the company building the parts & how many are produced. Edelbrock, MSD, Mile Marker, etc are tiny little companies compared to the mighty Ford Motor Company. This means their R&D departments are much smaller than Ford's. It also means that if they put out a bad design, they don't have as substantial a warranty/repair bill as Ford would. After all these years, I've taken almost all those shiny Summit racing parts off my truck, and replaced them with FoMoCo parts. There is obviously the problem with cheap Chinese sensors, TFI modules, clutch master cylinders, etc causing problems. But you are starting with a very well built & designed product, that was used in hundreds of thousands, if not millions of vehicles. That is something the Holly, Edelbrock, etc cannot say.
_________________ "America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." – Claire Wolfe 74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, TGW HP1060 and HP1014 axles, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, York OBA, 4x4x2, custom dash & gauges 72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
|
Thu Dec 22, 2016 10:29 pm |
|
|
Rox Crusher
Official CCB Member
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 5:36 pm Posts: 3980 Location: Roxborough Park, Colorado
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
Strike2
Pm me your email and I will send you a spreadsheet that documents most of the costs associated with OEM EFI.
_________________ 1977 Sport, 351w OBDII EFI motor, 4R70W auto, 4:88 gears, ARB lockers, 3.5" suspension, 33" tires.
|
Fri Dec 23, 2016 7:27 am |
|
|
Strike2
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 11:34 am Posts: 808
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
Thanks Gunnibronco I appreciate the response, I'm somewhat seasoned my self and have been guilty of the "glittery" parts in past builds. Dependability is my first priority as I pride myself in not just throwing something together or you could call it stubborn so your OEM/R&D points are well taking.
I'm only 4-5 years into this 4x4 scene along with any forum info. I built my last rig reading magazines and researching the internet with no actually local feedback so when I made the decision to get/build a bronco I knew right from the start to get on a forum and start asking question and not go this alone. I hope to benefit from everyone's learning's and talents regarding Bronco's along with hopefully bringing some of my strengths and resources to the group.
|
Fri Dec 23, 2016 7:45 am |
|
|
Eck
Official CCB Member
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:33 pm Posts: 2460
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
_________________ 69 Wagon, 351W, Explorer EFI & Serpentine, ZF5, 35" tires, 3.5 SL, 2 BL, WARN 8274
|
Fri Dec 23, 2016 10:44 am |
|
|
Strike2
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 11:34 am Posts: 808
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
|
Fri Dec 23, 2016 12:36 pm |
|
|
Justin
Official CCB Member
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:04 am Posts: 6198 Images: 0 Location: Lakewood
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
If you go for factory EFI, keep an eye out for aftermarket intakes as well. I scored my Edelbrock for less than most Lightning lowers go for.
|
Fri Dec 23, 2016 10:54 pm |
|
|
sykanr0ng
Official CCB Member
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 1:46 am Posts: 405 Location: Greeley, CO
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
There was one cast iron 'GT40' lower on eBay a day or two ago, it was $649 The cast iron were for boats and cheaper usually.
The aftermarket manifolds do not match up.
Cost wise a stroker is making more sense to me.
_________________ "You say overkill like it's a bad thing."
|
Sun Dec 25, 2016 6:52 pm |
|
|
EFI Guy
VENDOR
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2013 8:22 pm Posts: 442 Location: Arvada
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
There was just a big discussion about this on faceyspacey with lots of differing opinions. I'm biased towards OEM Explorer stuff myself.
Linky...
|
Mon Dec 26, 2016 12:48 am |
|
|
ZOSO
Moderator
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 5:58 pm Posts: 3906 Location: Henderson, Co
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
I too had this same thought only due to the price of the lower lightning intake. But my mind was made up when I found mine and got a stupid good deal on everything. The factory setup may run you more money but well worth it. Not to mention we have the efi guru local to us so it's even better.
_________________ Rob
74 Ranger EFI351w, 4r70w, ARB 5.13 9in, ARB 5.13D44, and a bunch of other goodies. Best of all the family memories.
04 Mustang Cobra, KenneBell 2.2 feeding a lot of boost on E85. Tire shredding machine
New project: 77 Bronco Ranger, body work and more body work.
Very little left of a 72 durango tan explorer sport
|
Mon Dec 26, 2016 7:41 am |
|
|
Strike2
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 11:34 am Posts: 808
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
|
Tue Dec 27, 2016 9:25 am |
|
|
Strike2
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 11:34 am Posts: 808
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
After some more researching and talking to some CCB members I think my plans may have changed. I'm thinking it makes more sense for now to simply just run and convert the 302 to EFI for now and just hold on to the 351 for a later upgrade. So with that said I've been scouting out the JY for an explorer donor. So I have a couple of questions
1) I've been told that a upper 96-98 Explorer is a good EFI candidate for the 19lb injectors along with the fuel pressure regulator on the fuel rail. are all 96-98 5.0 explorers coil pack systems, and are you removing all the wiring just to the firewall connection?
2) Should I also be looking at the same donor for the front end parts to gain a serpentine setup?
3) I read that explorers from 1996 and newer all came with the 4R70W but changes were made in 98 are these transmissions considered better? or since I will more than likely have it rebuilt is getting a 96-97 transmission a concern?
I understand I will need to modify the harness/computer along with a multiple of parts to swap engine and trans over, I'm just thinking does it make sense to gather a 96-98 EFI upper parts and then look for a 98 or newer transmissions or should I be looking on CL (some are less than 1000) for a complete 1996-1998 5.0 A/T Explorer and if so is there anything I should be aware of while looking at potential donors ?
|
Thu Dec 29, 2016 9:47 am |
|
|
Eck
Official CCB Member
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:33 pm Posts: 2460
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
1) That is correct-- if you are going to be running the 302 for the time being, you can use just about everything from the lower intake manifold up. My understanding is that the 96 Throttle Body is the best one to use because it has the lowest profile. See the picture below (thanks EFIGuy) for what wires to pull. Also, I encourage you to see the thread on CB.com if you haven't already: http://classicbroncos.com/forums/showth ... p?t=25725196-97 EFI harness.jpg You will also want to pull all wires to the injectors. You will also want to source 2 of the green O2 sensors located on the underside/exhaust of the Explorer. 2) You can use the same donor for the serpentine but if for some reason stuff is missing off the donor, you can use any 5.0 96-98 Explorer or Mountaineer for the Serpentine setup. 3) I will leave this to the transmission guru (s) to respond. I would say that if all you are wanting from an engine are the EFI parts and Serpentine parts, pulling from a JY should cost you about $500-$600. I would personally not buy the injectors from the JY and just buy a refurbished set (they are available for around $100 on eBay and come fully cleaned tested, and new gaskets). The transmission adds about another $125 from the JY. The downside is obviously working at the JY during winter. Sounds like you have a good plan. This will also give you the time to look for deals on parts and plan out your 351W build. Most everything should transfer over with the exception of the lower intake. Depending on what current heads you have on your 351W engine, you may also consider taking the GT40 (P) heads from whatever Explorer donor you take from.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
_________________ 69 Wagon, 351W, Explorer EFI & Serpentine, ZF5, 35" tires, 3.5 SL, 2 BL, WARN 8274
|
Thu Dec 29, 2016 12:13 pm |
|
|
Strike2
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 11:34 am Posts: 808
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
|
Thu Dec 29, 2016 1:24 pm |
|
|
Viperwolf1
Official CCB Member
Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 10:37 pm Posts: 1485
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
The 98 and newer 4r70w is better. You can upgrade the older ones though.
|
Thu Dec 29, 2016 1:25 pm |
|
|
Eck
Official CCB Member
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:33 pm Posts: 2460
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
I'm heading over there shortly with my Bronco if you want to hang around to see it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
_________________ 69 Wagon, 351W, Explorer EFI & Serpentine, ZF5, 35" tires, 3.5 SL, 2 BL, WARN 8274
|
Thu Dec 29, 2016 1:47 pm |
|
|
66Crawler
Official CCB Member
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 4:41 pm Posts: 92 Location: Longmont, CO
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
The other option not mentioned for the 351 FI swap is to run a truck lower with a BC Broncos adapter that adapts a Mustang upper.
It will not flow as well as a GT40 set up but it is a pretty easy route to go and wont break the bank.
A few guys have also had pretty good luck with the Howell FI stuff. It isn't Ford OEM but most of the parts are Chebby OEM so they are easy to get.
Like others have said OEM might cost a little more upfront but it is worth it if you can break down anyplace with an auto parts store and get what you need to fix it.
_________________ 66 1/2 Cab Rock Toy 68 Mall Crawler (someday)
|
Fri Dec 30, 2016 2:05 pm |
|
|
Strike2
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 11:34 am Posts: 808
|
Re: 351 EFI OEM vs NEW
Thanks Viperwolf1 on the transmission info, and 66 Crawler on the intake option. I was able to check out Eck's and Landsharks broncos the other day, these were the first EB that I've had the chance to see up close and in person and got some great insight from both of them Thanks Guys !
|
Fri Dec 30, 2016 7:59 pm |
|
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 76 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|